sqbr: pretty purple pi (existentialism)
Sean ([personal profile] sqbr) wrote in [personal profile] bluflamingo 2010-01-17 04:51 am (UTC)

*agrees*

For the most part I think the "Is published m/m romance exploitative of gay men?" question is not something I should poke as a straight woman who doesn't read published m/m romance. But some of the assumptions made as the discussion has shifted into fanfic have bugged me.

I do not find m/m sex remotely sexy, but still have a few boyslashy stories knocking around in my head because they are interesting stories that happen to be about two men in a romantic relationship. I mean, I think if you write a lot of fiction with relationships in and none of them are m/m then you might want to think about why. (In my case I think it's mainly because I like female protagonists, but I still poke myself about my lack of gay male secondary characters)

People keep comparing it to "lesbian porn aimed at men" but I think it's important to remember there's actually a lot of generally respected f/f romance written by men: Strangers in Paradise, Revolutionary Girl Utena, bits of Buffy etc. There's male femslash writers too.

Which is not to say some slash isn't creepy with regards to gender/sexuality, but to frame the argument as "It's exploitative porn" vs "It's porn as legitimate female self expression" is to undersell the variety and depth of slash.



Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting