So, here's the thing. With the US being (we hope) about to repeal don't ask, don't tell, this keeps popping up in SGA fic, and it's all happy cheerful, now I can be openly together with whoever I've been (secretly) pining for/with for x number of years, yay!
Which, if it's John and Cam, or Lorne and... actually, pretty much anyone except John, or, I don't know, Cadman and Carter post-Atlantis, is fine, because the only rule they were at risk from was don't ask don't tell.
However: if it's John/Rodney, John/Ronon, John/Lorne, Lorne/Parrish-on-his-team, aren't they still breaking the fraternisation rules? As in, no close relationships with someone in your chain of command or on your team? And hence, shouldn't that at least merit some kind of comment, even if it's just a handwavey 'the SGC doesn't care'?
Or am I totally misinterpreting that rule?
Which, if it's John and Cam, or Lorne and... actually, pretty much anyone except John, or, I don't know, Cadman and Carter post-Atlantis, is fine, because the only rule they were at risk from was don't ask don't tell.
However: if it's John/Rodney, John/Ronon, John/Lorne, Lorne/Parrish-on-his-team, aren't they still breaking the fraternisation rules? As in, no close relationships with someone in your chain of command or on your team? And hence, shouldn't that at least merit some kind of comment, even if it's just a handwavey 'the SGC doesn't care'?
Or am I totally misinterpreting that rule?
no subject
Fraternization is actually about officers and enlisted--with John and members of his team, it'd be about "unprofessional relationships" (3rd para of AF article) since none of them are enlisted. Jack/Sam wouldn't have fallen under fraternization, I think, since technically that applies to officers and enlisted and they're both officers.
To answer your question, yeah, I think there would still be a problem with John sleeping with a teammate.
no subject
To answer your question, yeah, I think there would still be a problem with John sleeping with a teammate.
Thanks! Though I have seen the occassional 'well, yeah, but we love each other, what difference does it make if we're sleeping together?' excuse. Actually, that would make a great prompt for the next round of lgbtfest.
no subject
I understand wanting to hand-wave the "sleeping together" issue when the SG teams are so close-knit already. I mean, Jack never canonically slept with any of his team, and yet he was very obviously, very massively compromised because of how he felt about them. (ETA: Okay, I may be exaggerating a bit. I'm trying to find the S8 ep where he risks a ship/the SGC for SG-1--it's the most obvious example.) I like fanwanking that he took the D.C. post because he knew he couldn't handle being commander of the SGC when his objectivity was so screwed up.
But it's naive, I think, to argue that sex doesn't make a difference. Maybe you could just move on and not have it affect your judgment, but you wouldn't know for sure until you were faced with a life-or-death situation. Why would you risk it? I personally think John has too much personal integrity, and takes his job too seriously, to put himself in that situation.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Of course, the SGC and Atlantis are already a morass of inappropriately close platonic relationships. They're shielded a bit by the people in charge and the fact that it's still secret and they're all difficult to replace. Even once disclosure comes around, for the main characters there'd be a strong incentive to look the other way to avoid the words 'scandal' and 'saved the planet' appearing in the same sentence in the press.
no subject